Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

3-203 - New Longitudinal and Experimental Evidence on the Powerful Influence of Ability Beliefs on Academic Success Across Development

Sat, March 21, 3:50 to 5:20pm, Penn CC, Floor: 200 Level, Room 201A

Session Type: Paper Symposium

Integrative Statement

People hold beliefs about many aspects of intellectual ability: whether it is malleable or fixed; whether it is clustered within certain social groups or distributed more uniformly; and so on. Many of us even have meta-level beliefs on this topic – beliefs about whether certain ability beliefs are endorsed by others. How does this intricate web of ability conceptions relate to actual academic ability and success? This symposium provides compelling new answers to this important question. The first talk suggests that simple interventions that instill adaptive beliefs (e.g., that intelligence is malleable) can effectively raise the achievement of college students who face harmful stereotypes about the intellectual potential of their group (e.g., first-generation students or negatively-stereotyped minority students). The second talk illustrates how children’s ability beliefs affect their achievement by shaping how they interpret the homework help they receive: Children who believe ability is fixed interpret parents’ help as evidence of low ability, with negative long-term effects for their achievement. The third talk examines the effects of meta-level ability beliefs: When female college students believe that their instructors hold a fixed view of STEM ability, they experience more stereotype threat, which lowers their performance and involvement. The fourth talk investigates the development of stereotyped beliefs about the intellectual abilities of men and women, and the striking effects of these beliefs on girls’ pursuit of intellectually-demanding activities. Together, these talks provide a coherent body of evidence on the link between ability beliefs and success.

Sub Unit

Chair

Individual Presentations