Session Summary
Share...

Direct link:

2-113 - On the Interplay Between Counterfactual Thinking and Decision-making in Childhood

Fri, April 7, 12:15 to 1:45pm, Austin Convention Center, Meeting Room 7

Session Type: Paper Symposium

Integrative Statement

Counterfactual thinking (thinking about “what might have been”) is a powerful learning tool. Counterfactual emotions such as regret and relief serve a functional role by highlighting missed opportunities so that better decisions are made in future (Epstude & Roese, 2008). Despite its obvious importance, the relationship between counterfactual thinking and decision-making in childhood has only recently begun to be explored. The three papers in this symposium elucidate this relationship. The first presents a novel approach by exploring young children’s counterfactual thinking in the context of their spontaneous decision-making. Children between 4 and 5 years considered the value of foregone alternatives when deciding whether to revise their choices. The second paper shows that children’s experience of counterfactual emotions contributes to their impulse control. Children between 6 and 7 years who felt regret after choosing a short wait for a small reward (rather than a long wait for a big reward), waited longer when presented with the same choice again than children who felt no regret. The third paper demonstrates that children’s experience of regret is dependent on their sense of agency. By age 7, children who are responsible for a given outcome express more negative emotion when learning that a foregone alternative was better than children who are not responsible for the outcome. Together, these studies reveal a bidirectional influence between counterfactual ideas and emotions and decision-making in early and middle childhood. The discussion will focus on the implications of these findings for theories of learning and decision-making.

Sub Unit

Chair

Discussant

Individual Presentations