Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Different cultures sustain different conceptions of the "ideal social child" and consequently construct different socializing experiences for their children during early childhood. This is greatly reflected in childcare settings (Doge & keller, 2014; Gernhardt et al, 2014; Tobin et al, 2004; Rourou et al 2006). Yet most training for educators in non-western socio-cultural subgroups is western-biased, entailing theoretical constructs that prioritize agency and self-regulation (Jaramillo et al, 2017; Gestsdottir et al, 2014; Keller, 2013; Trommsdorff, 2009) thus endorsing an individualistic image of the developing child. These concepts may not be congruent with values and attitudes held by more "traditional" educators, and require further adaptation (Zhao, 2018; Yilmaz et al, 2016; Pardhan, 2012).
Likewise, the literature on adapting early-prevention programs highlights the concept of "cultural sensitivity" yet provides general and somewhat vague guidelines for implementation (Garner et al, 2014; Gardiner & French, 2011). Most studies on program-adaptation refer to North-American early-prevention programs, where those who deliver the intervention ("interventionists") are mainly white-middle-class professionals, imposing the developmental goals of the dominant socio-cultural group on the minority participants. There is a dearth of studies on adapting prevention programs for other societies, such as Arab educators in Israel; and no empirical data on inter-cultural differences and unique challenges when the interventionists are from within the socio-cultural group. Furthermore, most studies on cultural child-rearing practices in the Arab society in Israel refer to family context (Feldman & Masslaha, 2010; Feldman et al, 2010), neglecting the childcare environment.
The current study aims to delineate the main challenges and areas of tensions in adapting an early-prevention program for Arab educators in Israel. The "Learning to Live Together" program addresses daily practices of educators to promote socio-emotional competence of children. The original program (Rosenthal & Gatt, 2010a, 2010b) was revised by 12 Arab early childhood senior professionals that served as co-authors for a culturally-sensitive program for Arab educators. Subsequently, they delivered the intervention in Arab childcare settings.
Using a narrative case study approach, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were held with these 12 Arab professionals. Findings identify 4 key issues of concern that require culturally-sensitive adaption, emphasizing the need to create a space for Arab educators to explore implicit conflicting attitudes: (1) "emotional display rules": Arab educators tend to discourage crying and overt expression of distress of children, conveying ambivalence as to what should be expressed/concealed "in-public". (2) "Talking about emotions": emotional vocabulary and discourse are not customary in the daily communication, yet educators feel obliged do so, according to western-models. (3) Exploring issues of authority and compliance: negotiations are not encouraged during peer-conflict; children are expected to comply with the educators' authority. (4) Articulating the educators' role as facilitator of socio-emotional development: Arab educators perceived themselves mainly as promoters of cognitive-academic competencies.
Additional findings reveal unique challenges for the Arab professional interventionists, who regard themselves mainly as "agents of social change" within their communities, thus expressing hostility towards the "less-westernized" educators. Implications for intervention are discussed within the context of multifaceted socio-cultural changes within the Arab society.