Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Search Tips
Register for SRCD21
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Children and adolescents differ in the ability to perceive and process positive and negative environmental stimuli. Individual differences in environmental sensitivity can be measured with the Highly Sensitive Child (HSC) scale (Pluess et al., 2018). The HSC scale captures three dimensions: Ease of Excitation (i.e., being easily overwhelmed), Low Sensory Threshold (i.e., unpleasant feelings caused by strong sensory stimuli), and Aesthetic Sensitivity (i.e., being aware of subtleties in the environment). Recently, we adapted the HSC scale by adding items that fit the original factor structure but perform better than the original 12 items (i.e., allowing more variation in responses and capturing Environmental Sensitivity more broadly) (Weyn et al., 2019). The present study introduces the HSC-24 which is meant to be normally distributed, reliable, measurement invariant, and valid across different populations and informants.
Data from two studies were used. In Study 1, 496 Belgian young adolescents (Mage= 10.82, SDage= 0.56, boys= 46%) participated. In Study 2, 151 young adolescents (Mage= 12.57, SDage= 1.37, boys = 41.2%) and 542 mothers (characteristics child: Mage= 9.91, SDage= 2.12, boys= 52.7%) participated. Participants completed questionnaires regarding Environmental Sensitivity (i.e. HSC-24) and internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors (i.e., Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Youth Self-Report, and Child Behavioral Checklist).
The HSC-24 showed (a) an acceptable model fit, good reliability, a relatively normal distribution, and measurement invariance across Belgium and the Netherlands and across child and mother reports, (b) moderate agreement between child and mother reports, but (c) no evidence for the moderating role of the HSC-24 in the relation between parenting and internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors (Table 1 and 2). Regarding criterion validity, the HSC-24 performed just as well as the original HSC scale. Thus, despite some reservations for criterion validity, the HSC-24 showed adequate psychometric properties across different populations and informants.
Sofie Weyn, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
Presenting Author
Karla Van Leeuwen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Non-Presenting Author
Michael Pluess, Queen Mary University of London
Non-Presenting Author
Francesca Lionetti, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara and Queen Mary University of London
Non-Presenting Author
Luc G. Goossens, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
Non-Presenting Author
Guy Bosmans, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
Non-Presenting Author
Wim Van Den Noortgate, KU Leuven
Non-Presenting Author
Anne Sophie Bröhl, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Non-Presenting Author
Patricia Bijttebier, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
Non-Presenting Author