Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Browse Posters
Search Tips
Register for SRCD23
Personal Schedule
Welcome Letter
Program Guide
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
There are significant disparities between heterosexual and sexual minority youth (SMY; e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer youth) in school-based discipline (Chmielewski et al., 2016; Mittleman, 2018). Less is known about SMY-based disparities for youth facing additional forms of marginalization. In this study, we examine disparities from an increasingly intersectional perspective based on the combination of youth’s sexual orientation, racial/ethnic identities, and gender.
Data and Methodology
We used the 2018 Dane County Wisconsin Youth Assessment, with a final sample of 23,905 students in grades 7-12 in 55 Wisconsin middle and high schools (see Table 1). Students reported their grade, sexual orientation, gender, and race/ethnicity, several covariates included in our model (peer victimization, bullying, truancy), and whether they had received an in-school or out-of-school suspension during the current school year (0=no; 1=yes). We used multilevel modeling to adjust for youth within schools, maximum likelihood with robust standard errors and the logit link function, and Montecarlo integration to handle missing data, to predict in-school suspension (model 1) and out-of-school suspension (model 2). Our focal predictors were participants’ identities at the intersection of race/ethnicity and sexual orientation (White heterosexual [reference group], White SMY, Black heterosexual, Black SMY, Latinx heterosexual, Latinx SMY, Asian-origin heterosexual, Asian-origin SMY, multiracial heterosexual, and multiracial SMY), and we further stratified our models by gender.
Results
We identified disparities for in-school and out-of-school suspensions based on students’ intersecting identities of race, sexual orientation, and gender (Table 2). For in-school suspensions, Black, Latinx, and multiracial heterosexual boys had greater odds of reporting in-school suspensions than White heterosexual boys (AOR = 3.59, 1.65, and 1.53, respectively). Odds of reporting in-school suspensions did not differ across racial/ethnic minority SMY boys relative to White heterosexual boys. Among girls, Black, Latinx, and multiracial heterosexual girls had greater odds of reporting in-school suspensions than White heterosexual girls (AOR = 6.00, 3.28, and 2.58, respectively), as did Black and multiracial SMY girls (AOR = 6.86 and 2.43, respectively).
For out-of-school suspensions, Black, Latinx, and multiracial heterosexual boys had greater odds of reporting suspensions than White heterosexual boys (AOR = 4.38, 1.74, and 2.15, respectively). Odds of reporting out-of-school suspensions did not differ across racial/ethnic minority SMY boys relative to White heterosexual boys. Among girls, Black, Latinx, and multiracial heterosexual girls had greater odds of reporting out-of-school suspensions than White heterosexual girls (AOR = 9.78, 3.71, and 3.28, respectively), as did Black and Asian-origin SMY girls (AOR = 13.50 and 3.24, respectively).
Discussion
These findings suggest that multiple systems of discrimination operate within schools, and young queer girls of color experience the brunt of this bias. Identity-based discipline disparities illustrate one indicator of a system that (un)consciously punishes youth who are not heterosexual, cisgender, and/or White. With this knowledge, those who shape disciplinary policy and practice have an opportunity to disrupt these patterns and implement strategies to create a school climate where all students are treated justly.