Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Browse Posters
Search Tips
Register for SRCD23
Personal Schedule
Welcome Letter
Program Guide
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Most research predicting children’s self-regulation from classroom experiences has focused on global classroom quality, but a growing body of literature suggests that it is the quality of students’ relationships with their teachers that matters. However, it remains unclear whether individual student-teacher relationships uniquely contribute to children’s self-regulation, net of global classroom-level quality (Jones et al., 2013; Cadima et al., 2016). Importantly, the measure of global classroom quality used in most previous studies (CLASS) is designed to capture classroom quality broadly, not teachers’ use of self-regulatory supports and strategies specifically, which may explain why it is only weakly and inconsistently related to self-regulatory development. A better test of the importance of student-teacher relationships for self-regulatory development over and above classroom-level quality would include a classroom-level measure designed to capture self-regulatory supports. The current study performs this test. It further asks whether the association between student-teacher relationship quality and self-regulatory development varies at different levels of classroom-level self-regulatory support, and whether these associations persist into children’s first-grade year.
We do this using data from an ongoing longitudinal study that began following low-income families and children in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 2016 when children were in preschool. During the kindergarten year, teachers completed the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (Pianta, 1992; 2001) for each study participant, which yields two subscales describing the teacher’s closeness and conflict with the child. Classroom-level self-regulatory support was observed using the Adapted Teaching Style Rating Scale (Jones et al., 2021), which yields two subscales: Classroom Structure and Management and Social and Emotional Opportunities. In the fall and spring of kindergarten and the fall of first grade, children’s self-regulation was measured using direct assessment (sum of the NIH Toolbox tests of inhibitory control and attention, Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test, and cognitive flexibility, Dimensional Change Card Sort; Zelazo et al. 2013), teacher ratings (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function; LeJeune et al., 2010), and assessor report (Preschool Self-Regulation Assessment; Smith-Donald et al., 2007). There were 724 children with complete data on classroom observations and spring teacher-child ratings in kindergarten and at least one measure of self-regulation at the spring of kindergarten. Separate OLS regression models predicted each measure of self-regulation in the spring of kindergarten from student-teacher relationship quality, classroom-level self-regulatory support, and the interaction between them, controlling for fall scores and child demographics. Models were then estimated predicting self-regulation in the fall of first grade.
Preliminary results (Table 1) suggest that student-teacher relationship quality in kindergarten predicted children’s self-regulation skills at the spring of kindergarten and again at the fall of first grade, even after controlling for children’s baseline (fall of kindergarten) self-regulatory skills and classroom-level self-regulatory support. Overall, these associations were stronger and more consistently significant for student-teacher conflict vs. closeness and for teacher-reported vs. directly assessed or assessor-rated self-regulation. Associations between student-teacher relationship quality and self-regulation did not vary by the quality of classroom-level self-regulatory support. Next steps include testing the robustness of results to alternate model specifications.