Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Browse Posters
Search Tips
Register for SRCD23
Personal Schedule
Welcome Letter
Program Guide
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Gaze direction reveals what other people look at, and hence learning to follow others’ gaze plays a major role in referential communication and infant language development (Senju & Johnson, 2009; Mundy et al., 2007). Infants are first found to follow adults’ gaze around 6 months of age, when preceded by ostensive cues such as direct eye contact or infant-directed speech (Senju & Csibra, 2008). However, infants do not follow only the gaze of humans, but also of other intentional agents such as robots that display face-like features and contingent reactivity (Johnson, Slaughter, & Carey, 1998). Previous screen-based studies comparing human vs. robot gaze following in infants have shown that 12-months-olds follow the gaze of both human and robotic agents, but that they only show subsequent preferential looking to the objects gazed by humans (Okumura et al., 2013; 2015). In the present study, we explore gaze following skills and subsequent preferential-looking and manual choice to the target object in a real contingent robot-infant interaction at the younger age of 3 and 6 months. In an effort to enhance the naturalistic nature of the interaction, we opted for a “Furhat robot”, designed to seem human-like and act as a social agent (i.e., a 3D lamp avatar with a back-projected face texture, that orients towards the infant and speaks naturally, escaping the Mona Lisa effect: Al Moubayed, Edlund, & Beskow, 2012). Infants (N=42) sat on their parents’ laps, facing the robot placed on a table with similar-sized toys at each side (see Figure 1). In the first phase, the robot made eye contact with the infant, oriented towards her, greeted in infant-directed speech, and silently gazed at the target object for 5 seconds before gazing back at the infant (6 trials, ABABBA side counterbalancing). The second phase was a preferential looking test to the two objects in the absence of the robot (30 sec), and the third phase was a manual choice test (experimenter prompting the child to grab one of the two objects). Results from the 3-month-old groups showed no evidence of gaze following in First Look (β = -0.16, z = -0.86, p > .1) or Looking time measures (β = 262, t = 0.81, p > .1, see Figure 2). At 6 months of age, however, infants displayed evidence of significant gaze following in both measures (β = 0.93, z = -4.77, p < .01; β = -952, t = -3.28, p < .01, respectively). The 30-sec test phase yielded no significant differences in either group (ps > .1), however 6 months tended to pick the target object more often than distractor (p = .05). These results suggest that human infants can follow the gaze of a social robot at 6 months of age, similar to prior screen-based studies in human gaze following (Senju & Csibra, 2008). These results lay a solid foundation for follow-up studies that further explore more complex infant-robot language learning interactions.