Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Browse Posters
Search Tips
Register for SRCD23
Personal Schedule
Welcome Letter
Program Guide
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Introduction: The Adaptive Control Hypothesis (Green & Abutalebi, 2013) describes three interactional contexts: single-language, dual-language, and dense code-switching. The dense code-switching context, which allows speakers to use all their linguistic resources opportunistically (e.g., Beatty-Martinez et al., 2020), may assist self-expression in children with disabilities who have limited resources in each language and/or potential executive function differences. However, code-switching studies of children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) usually have an expected target language (e.g., Gross & Kaushanskaya, 2022; Gutierrez-Clellen et al., 2009; Kapantzoglou et al., 2021), and there is limited work on code-switching by autistic children (Yu, 2016). The current study examined language choices of bilingual children (neurotypical, autistic, and with DLD) in a dense code-switching environment and differences from a single-language environment.
Hypotheses: The ability to modulate code-switching depending on the environment may require high bilingual proficiency. For children with limited skills in one or both languages (including those with DLD), code-switching may be a necessary resource for expression, and we may expect fewer differences between environments. We did not have a specific hypothesis for autistic children, given the paucity of research on code-switching and mixed findings about how autistic children adjust their register for different listeners (e.g., Volden et al., 2007).
Study Population: Data collection is in progress with children ages 4-6 who were exposed to Spanish from birth and can produce simple phrases in both Spanish and English. Preliminary analyses included 4 autistic children (3 boys, 1 girl), 8 children with DLD (5 boys, 3 girls), and 10 neurotypical children (5 boys, 5 girls). The majority of children were exposed to mostly Spanish at home and English at school, with varying exposure to code-switching.
Method: In a scripted confederate dialogue task, children took turns describing pictures with a partner in three language environments: with a bilingual partner who code-switched frequently, with a Spanish-speaking monolingual partner, and with an English-speaking monolingual partner. The partners were presented as pre-recorded videos over Zoom but appeared to be interacting in real time. Caregivers provided information about their child’s language environment, and children completed measures of language and cognitive skills.
Results: Individual data for use of English, Spanish, and code-switching in each environment are shown in Figure 1, and group box plots for code-switching (the outcome of interest) are shown in Figure 2. Autistic children exhibited limited code-switching, except one child who code-switched frequently in only the code-switching environment. For DLD and neurotypical groups, a mixed-effects logistic regression revealed that children code-switched more in the code-switching than the English environment (z=4.82), with no difference between Spanish and code-switching environments (z=1.08). There was no effect of group (z=0.65) but a tendency (z= -1.70) for the DLD group to show a smaller difference between the code-switching and English environments compared to neurotypical peers. Analyses with the full sample will examine moderators of this environment effect, such as relative proficiency and code-switching exposure. Findings will be contextualized within a developmental approach to the Adaptive Control Hypothesis and implications for incorporating code-switching into bilingual assessment and intervention.