Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Panel
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic Area
Browse Posters
Search Tips
Register for SRCD23
Personal Schedule
Welcome Letter
Program Guide
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Vocabulary-learning represents one of the most crucial undertakings in child-development and constitutes an important predictor of academic achievement (Verhagen et al., 2019). Vocabulary-acquisition is especially challenging for children learning two languages as they must partition their language-acquisition resources (Maier et al., 2016). To determine children’s vocabulary-skills their ability to repeat novel words—nonwords—is particularly relevant (Baddeley et al., 1998). Nonword-repetition taps into phonological-working-memory (PWM) skills; these relate to better vocabulary-development presumably because with greater PWM-capacity novel words can be better anchored within semantic long-term memory and are processed more precisely on a phonological-level (Farabolini et al., 2022).
Indeed, PWM has been shown to predict vocabulary-development—concurrently and longitudinally—both in studies examining single- or dual-language-learning children (abbreviated as SLL and DLL, respectively; Parra et al., 2011; Verhagen et al., 2019). However, research is missing that examines whether PWM predicts future vocabulary-learning-development similarly in SLL for their single language as for DLL children in both of their languages. Acquiring two instead of only one language comes along with reduced language-input and language-use opportunities in either language, as well as with an increased amount of phonological diversity (Hoff, 2018). PWM may hence potentially play a more superior role within DLLs’ than SLLs’ vocabulary-learning. The extent to which this assumed difference in a PWM-prediction-effect is evident both at the receptive and expressive level of vocabulary-development could further help determine the magnitude in which PWM facilitates vocabulary-development at an encoding or retrieving level, respectively.
The present study aimed to address these research gaps by employing longitudinal multilevel modelling to disentangle the PWM-influences onto both concurrent and subsequent receptive- and expressive-level vocabulary-growth in preschool-aged SLL- and DLL-children.
Data were analyzed from 317 SLL- (speaking either German or French as the societal- language (SLA)) and 214 DLL-children (who additionally were learning either Turkish or Italian as their heritage-language (HLA)) aged 3 to 6 years. Receptive- and expressive-vocabulary-skills were assessed at three measurement time-points via an adaptive-testing-battery containing parallelized and standardized language-test-items for SLA and HLA, respectively. All children performed an adapted version of Chiat’s (2015) quasi-universal-nonword-repetition-PWM-task at t1.
As expected, cross-sectional data-examination revealed that SLLs held larger receptive and expressive SLA-vocabularies than their DLL peers (b=-0.63; p<.001; b=-0.91; p<.001). Over all SLL and DLL children, PWM denoted concurrent receptive SLA-vocabulary (b=0.18; p=.002) and, at trend-level, also expressive SLA-vocabulary (b=0.09; p=.063). However, PWM was not indicative for DLLs’ HLA-vocabulary-skills (ps>.17). Longitudinal growth-curve models showed that high PWM-skills positively predicted expressive but not receptive SLA-vocabulary-development (b=0.008; p=.007; b=0.003; p=.312). Notwithstanding, this effect of PWM on expressive-level SLA-vocabulary-growth was stronger for DLL-children (b=0.008; p=.007). Yet, PWM led to no substantial receptive- or expressive HLA-vocabulary-growth in DLLs (both ps>.10).
The present findings show that the anticipated superior importance of PWM can at best become visible in SLA-specific expressive vocabulary tasks. This suggests that PWM is particularly important for word-retrieval and word-utterance in the SLA of DLL-children but less during receptive-level encoding. The greater relevance of our findings for educational contexts shall be discussed.
Weiner-Bühler, J. C., Schächinger Tenés, L. T., Grob, A., & Segerer, R. K.