Session Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Minimal and real-world social categories shape expectations of prosocial behavior across development

Fri, March 24, 12:00 to 1:30pm, Salt Palace Convention Center, Floor: 2, Meeting Room 255 F

Session Type: Paper Symposium

Abstract

Prosocial behavior is a foundation of human connection. The present symposium illuminates new ways in which social groups – minimal or real-world – shape children’s expectations of prosociality. First, we explore how children’s developing intuitions about prosociality vary as a function of minimal group membership. Paper 1 examines expectations of empathy for a minimal ingroup vs. outgroup: Children and adults expected more empathy within than between groups; strikingly, when the ingroup and outgroup were said to dislike each other, children and adults expected a type of reverse-empathy: positive emotion in response to the outgroup’s misfortune. Paper 2 asks how the physical proximity and cultural similarity between two groups shape beliefs about whether one group is obligated to help the other: Adults were more parochial than children, reporting stronger obligation to help close and similar groups. Second, we explore how an important real-world group, gender, shapes children’s expectations of prosocial behavior. While past work finds that young children help regardless of gender, the present papers explore how expectations of helping become gendered. Paper 3 explores a potential downside of helping: Children expected one social group (girls) to help more than another (boys), even at a cost to themselves. Finally, Paper 4 explores how gender shapes the perceived value of prosocial behavior: Adults devalued the types of prosociality associated with girls (e.g., emotional and cognitive labor). Together, these papers show how minimal and real-world group memberships shape expectations of prosociality, sometimes to the detriment of certain groups (e.g., outgroup members, girls).

Sub Unit

Chairs

Individual Presentations