Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
We offer a method to map and make sense of existing interventions that occur at the interface between science, technology and society. Such interventions are varyingly contained under the banner of technology assessment, responsible innovation, action research etc. While such interventions are becoming prevalent, there are few extant attempts to understand their dynamics. The method we present draws attention to five categories of architectural feature: 1) motivations; 2) sites of intervention; 3) necessary and mobilised resources; 4) methods for intervention; 5) the ways that change is envisaged by participants. We envisage this method to be used as a protocol for data elicitation through interview, self-reflection or focus group. By generating a series of systematically produced accounts of intervention, we hope to draw attention to the goals, outcomes and plethora of different strategies that are being enacted in intervention research in and with science, technology and society.
Michael Bernstein, Arizona State University
Robert David Jonathan Smith, University of Nottingham
Stefan Schäfer, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies
Shannon Spruit, Delft University of Technology
Eleanor Hadley Kershaw, Institute for Science & Society, University of Nottingham
sarah Hartley, University Of British Columbia
Rider W Foley, University of Virginia
Richard Rushforth, Northern Arizona University
Philip Boucher, University of Manchester
Andrew Chilvers, University College London
Lalitha Sundaram, University of Cambridge