Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Research Area
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
That experimental subjects and tissue donors in biocapitalism act out of a thoroughly altruistic motivation, out of mere selflessness, has been, and still is, a powerful narrative that is constantly revived by various actors involved in biomedical research. STS approaches are challenging this notion, pointing to its conceptual shortcomings and/or critiquing its social consequences, e.g. the creation and securing of access to a massive unpaid labour force for biomedical innovation. In a conceptual, governance-oriented line of critique, Barbara Prainsack and Alena Buyx (2016) advocate for solidarity as a tool for analysis and a normative point of reference in biomedical practice today.
The paper takes up findings from a case study involving experimental subjects and medical personnel in psoriasis research in Germany and discusses the following questions: Do altruistic motives matter in experimental subjects’ accounts? Would these matters more accurately be described by introducing the concept of solidarity? And if so: Solidarity with whom? Which pitfalls and critical potentials do or do not unfold within the process of such a reinterpretation? And how is the figure of the experimental subject herself transformed?