Academic Evaluation Effects on Knowledge Production: Insights from Uruguayan Scientists

• In Event: Evaluation of Academic Science and Scientists: Perspectives from Latin America

Abstract

Diverse effects of academic evaluation on knowledge production have been highlighted on the STS literature. These include the well-known Mathew effect, an increased competition among scientists for academic recognition, the strengthening of mainstream scientific disciplines and their research priorities over new approaches, a reduction of cognitive diversity, among others. It is frequently accepted that different styles of knowledge production require different evaluation methods to take into account epistemological differences and the multiple forms in which research results are communicated. However, the preponderance of a standardized model for academic evaluation based on “objective” indicators has been expanded worldwide. Uruguay is no exception. Research orientations and practices associated with different cognitive traditions and the criteria for academic performance evaluation are increasingly confronted. This presentation addresses the way in which Uruguayan researchers perceive the influence of evaluation criteria on research agendas. We conducted an empirical research based on qualitative interviews, an on line survey, and focus groups with a sample of researchers in all academic fields and career stages. The paper will discuss the different views according to which evaluation criteria are shaping scientists decisions and practices regarding academic research in Uruguay.

Authors

• Mariela Bianco, Universidad de la Republica

• Sofia Robaina, Universidad de la Republica

• Maria Goñi, Universidad de la República

• Camila Ceballos, Universidad de la Republica