Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Research Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
An increasing awareness of the potential biases and problematic social impacts of digital technologies is driving a renewed focus on social responsibility and ethical considerations within the fields of engineering and the computer and data sciences. Similarly, a renewed sense of complicity in our socio-technical environments has encouraged STS scholars to engage more directly in public-facing socio-technical work, often through prototyping, exhibition, and hands-on educational activities. However, practical and epistemic difficulties continue to impact our capacities to bridge across technical and social disciplines and to innovate the pedagogical activities of both areas. The so-called ‘great divide’ as described by Bowker, Star, Turner, and Gasser remains as present today as when they engaged with this issue in the late 90’s. In this talk, I will provide some reflection on my own experiences developing hybrid methodologies, the weaknesses of my past approaches, and highlight some new methodological starting points. Specifically, I will describe the importance of ‘hopeful monsters’, a term that has been used by STS scholars to describe socio-technical things that do not quite fit in the world as it stands. A re-engagement with the constructive in addition to the deconstructive opportunities of STS provides a way to activate alternative pedagogies that take seriously the interventionist needs of the technical fields while remaining connected to the objectives and goals of our own critical epistemologies.