Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Research Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper proposes a research-based, interpretative approach, that aims to explain how the Internet contributes to the expert authority crisis of the reflexive modernization era (Beck, Giddens & Lash: 1994). Based on a long-term ethnographic fieldwork of online open collaboration communities, I argue that the digital turn brought distrust into social interactions, enhancing a need to verify claims and arguments of others, in a variety of social settings. While the Internet offers a way to disrupt knowledge regimes, with its abundance of information, it also supports the expert authority crisis by inviting un-limited, blind skepticism. This dynamic, easily observable in avid discussions between strangers on social media platforms, is quite noticeable in the relation to experts, such as medical doctors, researchers or academics. I build my argument referring to the fieldwork among grass-root knowledge activists – with an example of pro-mainstream-science and alternative-knowledge advocates operating in a transmedia environment, I investigate how various alternative communication routes are used to influence discourses in areas of science, health and nutrition. I provide a critical insight into how different platforms, acting as infrastructures, help to facilitate, crystalize and materialize various new relations of public engagement among different prod-users, disrupting existing power relations around knowledge production. By analyzing the work of my interviewees, I highlight their ambiguous role in the expert authority crisis of the reflexive modernization era. Through their digital advocacy practices, they become new authorities in the entangled networks of online communication.