Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Research Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Feminist neomaterialisms and feminist STS mostly follow Karen Barad’s directive concept of the entanglement of matter and meaning. It is driven in part by the material-semiotic approach that initially guided actor-network theory following Bruno Latour’s contribution e.g. in the 1990’s paper Drawing Things Together.
Although there were strong moments in STS that focused on inscription devices, such as Karin Knorr-Cetina’s 1995 Laboratory Studies and Bruno Latour’s and Steve Woolgar’s 1986 Laboratory Life, it is remarkable that at present the semiotic side is underdeveloped in the ‘material-semiotic’ (Asdal 2015).
In my paper I will commemorate the contributions to the material-semiotic made by Knorr-Cetina, Latour, Barad and Haraway and try to productively re-stage an emphasis on the semiotic side. The aim of such a re-stagement would be to shape the narratives of (feminist) STS’s trajectories towards a re-enactment of a politicized semiotics, like Donna Haraway suggests throughout her work (e.g. 1984 in Primatology is Politics by Other Means).