Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Research Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In 2017, the world’s largest credit rating agency (CRA), Moody's, announced that it had begun to factor a city’s “resilience” and “vulnerability” to climate change into its municipal bond rating schemes. Other CRAs have similarly proclaimed that they will soon follow suit. Because of their apparent “structural power,” actors across a range of industries and political orientations have both feared and called for significant CRA action on urban climate change governance. In this paper, I use expert interviews and documentary analysis to examine the motivations behind recent CRA interventions in urban climate change governance; how CRAs construct urban resilience as a ratable value, and what political values they embed into these nascent constructions. Miami is the first city which Moody’s has explicitly rated for its actions on urban resilience. Through a brief case study of contemporary resilience planning initiatives in Miami, I examine the extent to which CRA activity motivates the forms and goals of urban resilience plans, the possible distributional outcomes of CRA-driven resilience planning, and the novel terrains of urban climate politics onto which these plans and activities unfold and help shape.