Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Research Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Meeting Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Capitalism is increasingly technoscientific, by which we mean that it is increasingly configured by the development and distribution of technoscientific products, services, platforms, and activities; in turn, technoscience is increasingly configured by the accounting, management, and performativity of profit-oriented organizational logics. Technoscientific capitalism is, in this sense, underpinned by organizational dynamics and inter-organizational relationships that often get obscured within STS debates about the supposed neoliberalization of society and science. A key question to ask, then, is how is technoscientific capitalism organized? What are the epistemic values, practices, and assets that are deployed in the entanglement of capitalism and technoscience? There are many possible answers here, not only aimed at these questions but also raising further questions for debate. Of particular interest to this Open Panel are the range of analytical and/or empirical takes on (1) epistemic and economic valuations, (2) academic values and practices, (3) organizational assets, relationships, and management, and (4) public-private frameworks that configure science, technology, and innovation.
Questions
•How are socio-epistemic relationships, practices, and resources organized to solve societal problems? Or to produce socio-economic value?
•What forms of knowledge and values do these relationships generate or constitute? How are these knowledges and values organized and managed?
•Are different forms and practices of knowledge more or less subject to processes of assetization, commodification, and/or capitalization?
•Do these processes assetization, commodification, and/or capitalization open up and/or close down the possibilities for inter-organizational relationships and practices?
Cities Reimagined as Digital Platforms: Assetization of Urban Data and Civic Data Governance - Anna Artyushina, York University
Hospital Imaginaries in the New Health Bioeconomy - John Grant Gardner, Monash University, Australia
Innovation Science: Vehicle between Commercial Innovation and Scientific Research - Joakim Juhl, Aalborg University Copenhagen
Open Science’s Role in the Implementation of Private-Public Collaborations in the Montreal’s AI Ecosystem - Marius Senneville, Institut national de la recherche scientifique; Jonathan Roberge, Institut national de la recherche scientifique
Organizational Changes and Structural (Dis)advantages in Digital Economy: The Case of Latency in Financial Markets - Bo Hee Min, Copenhagen Business School