Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
About TAS 2018 Meeting
About Midland College
Interactive Campus Map
Midland College Map
Directions from hotels to Midland College
Directions from Conference Hotels to CAF for Awards Dinner
Nearby Dining
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The use of three-dimensional (3D) printed models of hominin fossils is becoming more common in biological anthropology, due in part to their low production cost. Digital meshes are also more accessible than casts, further increasing the reach and impact of specific specimens. An inherent trust in scanning protocols and 3D printers underlies the utilization of prints, though scanner type, processing techniques, environmental variables, and proprietary algorithms used by 3D printers can, and do, influence the way that 3D prints convey the topology of the original scan. The type specimen of Australopithecus sediba (MH 1), downloaded from MorphoSource, is used to highlight these issues. In this study we assess the precision of five different brands of 3D printers, and subsequently the repeatability and reliability of a single printer. The original scan data are compared to the printed/scanned (measured) data in Geomagic Control X using a 3D comparison to identify global deviations, a 2D comparison to identify deviations for specific curves used in geometric morphometric (GM) analyses, and a suite of comparison points to compare deviations of specific locations on the mesh surface. This project quantitatively demonstrates which 3D printer produces models that most closely resemble the original specimen—based upon currently-deployed settings and environmental configurations—and repeatable replication of models generated on a single printer. Through a critical assessment, this project makes clear the implications and risks associated with the reuse of archived 3D meshes in research, teaching, and museum-based endeavors.