Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In auditing, one of the most important and challenging decisions is the decision to issue first-time going-concern opinions. While researchers have had considerable success identifying factors that influence auditors’ decisions, little research has addressed factors influencing cross-sectional propensities to issue modified opinions. Research from psychology and economics documents that decision-makers frequently overweight salient information. We consider the potentially salient aspect of geographic proximity to prior going-concern opinions. We hypothesize and find that, after controlling for known factors, auditors’ first-time going-concern reporting decisions are influenced by the prior-year proportion of firms in auditors’ home-states receiving first-time going-concern opinions. Specifically, this home-state bias makes a modified opinion up to 13.3% more likely, significantly decreases auditor accuracy, and also leads to higher rates of auditor change. This relation is particularly strong for smaller audit firms. Our findings challenge the notion that a higher propensity to issue a going-concern opinion reflects higher audit quality.
Allen D Blay, The Florida State University
James Robert Moon, The Florida State University
Jeffrey S Paterson, The Florida State University