When the World Isn’t Always Flat: The Impact of Psychological Distance on Auditors’ Reliance on Specialists

• In Event: Auditors Use of Specialists

Abstract

This study addresses recent calls for research on the conditions influencing auditor decisions related to PCAOB-encouraged reliance on third-party experts. To this end, the present study explores the effect of psychological distance on external auditors’ reliance when induced through physical distance in a telework relationship between an auditee and a specialist. The reliance decision focuses on the auditee’s contracting with a computer audit specialist who works remotely through a telework arrangement. The psychological distance associated with this telework arrangement is examined both in the context of variance in the physical distance of the computer audit specialist and the interactive effect of a contextual factor – the historical experience with an auditee’s internal audit function. A 2x2 experiment with a total of 121 experienced Big 4 auditors is conducted in which psychological distance (physically proximate or remote specialist) and historical experience with an auditee’s internal audit function (presence or absence of a prior year material weakness in internal controls) are manipulated. Consistent with predictions based on construal level theory, we find that psychological distance affects auditors’ reliance judgment such that increased distance leads to lower reliance. Furthermore, the historical experience with the auditee’s internal audit function creates a halo effect which moderates the effect of psychological distance such that the differential effect of a present vs. absent prior year material weakness on auditors’ confidence and associated willingness to reduce budgeted audit hours is larger for a psychologically distant specialist. The results of this study suggest that an auditee’s choice of a more proximate specialist may garner greater reliance by the external auditor, particularly when there is a material weakness in the prior year audit that the specialist is intended to help ameliorate.

Authors

• Martin Michael Weisner, University of Central Florida

• Steve G Sutton, University of Central Florida