ERROR: relation "aaa150401_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa150401_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa150401_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa150401_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Auditing Section Midyear Meeting and Doctoral Consortium: An Exploration of the Choice to Voluntarily Comply with SOX Section 404(b)
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

An Exploration of the Choice to Voluntarily Comply with SOX Section 404(b)

Sat, January 17, 7:30 to 8:30am, TBA

Abstract

Central to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a requirement that every company have an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. However, there were also concerns that this requirement was overly burdensome, from a financial perspective, for small businesses. This concern promoted several delays in enforcing the law for small companies and ultimately caused congress to permanently exempt small businesses. Yet there are some small companies that voluntarily elect to comply with the law. We explore why these companies elect to incur these costly audits. We document that small companies getting audits of internal controls may be doing so to restore investor confidence after reporting failures, to appear credible prior to raising funds, as a response to organizational changes, or in anticipation of being required to comply.

Authors