Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Conference
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Location
About AAA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
For a company to report greenhouse gas emissions generated within its value chain, it must identify self-generated emissions (i.e., Scope 1), emissions from power providers (i.e., Scope 2), as well as emissions from upstream suppliers and downstream customers (i.e., Scope 3). Considering the complexities of reporting emissions generated by third-parties, this study evaluates blockchain as a tool to track and report Scope 3 emissions. Blockchain is uniquely positioned to track emissions as they move between members of a value chain given its (1) shared ledger of events stored in a tamper-resistant ecosystem, (2) non-fungible tokens that can uniquely represent a product’s emissions at a specific point in the value chain, and (3) smart contracts that ensure a complete and accurate transfer of emissions between parties. This study applies the Design Science Research Methodology to evaluate blockchain’s ability to track Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions in a manufacturing value chain.
Mark Donald Sheldon, John Carroll University
James Gregory Jenkins, Auburn University
Eric Negangard, University of Virginia