Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
We examine the relative contributions of mispricing and value relevance to the pricing of abnormal accruals. Unlike prior research, we provide estimates of how much of the pricing of abnormal accruals is due to value relevance and how much is due to mispricing. Our estimates suggest approximately half of abnormal accrual valuation is due to their value relevance and half is due to mispricing. However, our estimates differ considerably by time period. Before 2002, nearly two-thirds of abnormal accruals pricing is due to mispricing, and the mispricing is not limited to extreme accruals, as prior research suggests. Post-2002, mispricing largely disappears. Further, the post-2002 reduction in mispricing is partially attributable to an improvement in the quality of accruals.
Jeremiah Green, The Pennsylvania State University
Frank Heflin, Florida State University
James Robert Moon, Georgia State University