ERROR: relation "aaa130601_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa130601_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa130601_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa130601_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.International Accounting Section Midyear Conference: The Spillover Effect of Chinese Reverse Merger Frauds: Chinese or Reverse Merger?
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

The Spillover Effect of Chinese Reverse Merger Frauds: Chinese or Reverse Merger?

Sat, February 23, 10:00 to 11:30am, Hyatt Regency Savannah, TBA

Abstract

This paper examines the spillover effect of the news about fraud allegedly committed by Chinese reverse mergers (CRMs). In a reverse merger, a private, operating company becomes public when it is acquired by a public shell company. A large number of Chinese companies became public in the last 10 years through reverse mergers with U.S. shell companies rather than through the traditional initial public offering. A number of these companies, however, have been found to be involved with fraudulent activities or reporting. Once the regulators and the public became alarmed by the frequency of fraud revelations, the stock prices of not only the offending companies but also those of other companies were hammered. Those that were affected more negatively are other CRMs and U.S.-listed Chinese IPOs. The negative spillover effect differs across non-fraudulent CRMs according to operation locations and auditor characteristics. Since reverse mergers involving non-Chinese private companies appear to have escaped the wrath of investors, the stock market reaction to fraud news appears to be China bashing rather than
reverse merger bashing.

Authors