Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
We examine the effect of borrowing firms’ accounting conservatism on debt contract renegotiations outside of default. We find that financial covenants in the debt contract are more likely to be renegotiated when borrowers’ accounting is more conservative. Financial covenants are also renegotiated sooner for more conservative borrowers than less conservative ones. Furthermore, the negative association between conservatism and ex ante cost of debt documented in prior literature is driven by the implication of conservatism on future renegotiation. Additional analyses confirm that the impact of conservatism on renegotiations occurs in the absence of any covenant violation and is not driven by other earnings attributes. Our study demonstrates the role of conservatism in the renegotiation process and expands the debt contracting explanation for conservatism (Watts, 2003) to a broader set of states, including those that are outside of default and financial distress.