ERROR: relation "aaa161401_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa161401_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa161401_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa161401_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Mid-Atlantic Region Meeting: Amoeba Management and Organizational Ambidexterity: Similarities, Differences, and Implications
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Amoeba Management and Organizational Ambidexterity: Similarities, Differences, and Implications

Fri, May 20, 11:00am to 12:15pm, Waterfront Place Hotel, TBA

Abstract

Amoeba management and organizational ambidexterity are two performance management systems that are potentially well suited to firms operating in highly competitive environments. Unfortunately, these two systems have been understudied and poorly understood. This paper examines a wide-ranging literature and includes research published in non-English-language journals, which is particularly essential for understanding the amoeba management concept. As this paper shows, while amoeba management and organizational ambidexterity share such commonalties as the promotion of organizational agility and the call for small-sized business units, several significant differences prevail. Amoeba management and ambidextrous organizations differ in terms of the strategies, organizational structures, organizational cultures, planning horizons, performance measures, approaches to employee involvement, employee selection practices, and leadership styles they pursue/adopt. The paper’s wide-angle synthesis of ideas and its unique construction of a set of performance management-based parameters for distinguishing and differentiating amoeba management from organizational ambidexterity mean the paper offers readers fuller and richer understandings of the two performance management systems and, in the process, promotes scholars and practitioners’ ability to make more informed decisions about the future study and adoption of these two systems.

Authors