ERROR: relation "aaa221701_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa221701_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa221701_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa221701_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Joint Meeting of the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Regions: Implications of Advisory Fee Structure for Fair Valuation in Bond Mutual Funds

Joint Meeting of the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Regions

Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Download

Implications of Advisory Fee Structure for Fair Valuation in Bond Mutual Funds

Fri, October 21, 3:30 to 4:50pm, Virtual, TBA

Abstract

I explore the risk-taking implications of advisory fee structures. Mutual
funds compensate their investment advisors with fees based on assets-under-management
(AUM). The fees can be either linear or concave functions of AUM. While prior literature
on equity mutual funds finds that advisors with a more linear fee structure engage in more
risk-taking, I find the opposite in bond mutual funds: they assume less risks. This
noteworthy difference is likely because bond mutual fund advisors have a greater incentive
to avoid AUM decline than to grow AUM, and those with a more linear fee structure have
an even greater incentive to do so. Further, I find that the negative association between fee
linearity and risk-taking is increasing in fund importance, redemption risk, and market
uncertainty. My findings suggest that the dynamics of the relation between advisory fee
structure and risk-taking in bond mutual funds differ from those in equity mutual funds.

Author