ERROR: relation "aaa191701_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa191701_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa191701_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa191701_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.AAA Midwest Region Meeting: What Does Customer Engagement on Social Media Convey about Firm Performance?
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Download

What Does Customer Engagement on Social Media Convey about Firm Performance?

Sat, October 19, 9:05 to 10:45am, The Palmer House Hilton, TBA

Abstract

In this paper, I explore whether the aggregate information in the volume of a firm’s tweets and the followers’ response predicts the firm’s quarterly earnings, earnings surprise, sales growth, unexpected sales growth, and market value. Additionally, I examine the relationship between the tweet behavior of a firm and its market value. My data comprises of 178,236 firm-quarters (46,449 Tweet firm-quarters) and approximately 17.50 million firm-initiated tweets collected from the primary Twitter sites of 2,229 public US firms between 2006 and 2017. I find that aggregate information in the volume of a firm’s tweets and the volume of engagement of followers during a quarter incrementally explains the actual quarterly earnings of the firm and this association is strongly positive. I further find that both level as well as change in the volume of tweets (engagement) provides additional information for predicting the firm’s sales growth. The results also suggest that analysts may be using this additional information to make more accurate earnings and sales forecast, which reduces the Tweet firm’s unexpected earnings and unexpected sales growth. My study also indicates that followers’ engagement is more informative than the firm’s tweet volume. The findings further suggest that market value of Tweet firm has a positive association with its volume of tweets (engagement) as well as a change in the volume of engagement. The results are robust to using alternative definitions of tweet volume (engagement).

Author