ERROR: relation "aaa151301_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa151301_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa151301_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa151301_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.AAA Ohio Region Meeting: Insider Ownership and the Demand for Audit Quality: Evidence from Dual-Class Firm
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Insider Ownership and the Demand for Audit Quality: Evidence from Dual-Class Firm

Fri, May 1, 3:55 to 5:35pm, Wyndham Playhouse Square, TBA

Abstract

We examine the association of insider ownership and clients’ demand for audit quality in the unique setting of dual-class firms. The effect of insider ownership on the extent of agency problems, and hence the demand for audit quality, is ambiguous, because insider ownership exerts two effects: a positive incentive-alignment effect (from cash flow rights) and a negative entrenchment effect (from board control rights). Using a comprehensive hand-collected sample of U.S. dual-class firms, we find that insider cash flow rights are negatively associated with audit fees, auditor independence, and the propensity to hire a Big 4 or industry specialist auditor, while insider board control rights and the extent of disproportionate insider control display opposite associations. These results are consistent with general agency theory, which suggests a decreased (increased) demand for audit quality from incentive-alignment (entrenchment) effects of ownership.

Authors