ERROR: relation "aaa171101_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa171101_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa171101_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa171101_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.AAA Southeast Regional Meeting: A Case Study on the Statistical Sensitivity of Conclusions in an Auditor’s Going Concern Report
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

A Case Study on the Statistical Sensitivity of Conclusions in an Auditor’s Going Concern Report

Fri, April 28, 10:45am to 12:00pm, Hilton Miami Downtown, TBA

Abstract

I have developed a case study that addresses how auditors evaluate a client’s going concern assumption. In this case scenario, the client has significant negative trends indicating doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. To mitigate the going concern issue, the client uses a discounted cash flow valuation to show the auditors its projected financial position. Students, acting as auditors, must evaluate the feasibility of management’s discounted cash flow analysis and make a judgement on whether the going concern issue is mitigated.

Authors