Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This study examines the impact of a company’s environmental social governance (ESG) activities and report language on two different sets of nonprofessional investors, those with a short-term investment strategy and those with a long-term investment strategy. Companies develop organizational facades to help strategically manage conflicting stakeholder demands. Organizational facades are categorized into three areas: rational, progressive, and reputation. Rational façade is the expectation that a company is acting rationally. Progressive façade focuses on the usage of innovation to improve operations. Reputation façade focuses on a company’s stewardship. ESG reports disclose a company’s strategy and reveal the type of façade being emphasized. Given that prior research has already examined rational facades, the current study assesses the impact of progressive, reputation, and progressive + reputation language. Specifically, this study investigates how the time horizon of a nonprofessional’s investment strategy affects their evaluation of ESG reporting and willingness to invest. The study finds…
Suzanne Mullinnix, AAA
Wioleta Celina Olczak, University of Central Florida
Robin W Roberts, University of Central Florida
Anis Triki, University of Rhode Island