Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Conference
Virtual Exhibit Hall
About AAA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This study examines how the voluntary disclosure practice as proxied by management earnings forecasts varies by firm’s life-cycle stages. Specifically, I examine if the probability to disclose, initiate, and stop disclosing management earnings forecasts varies across life cycle stages. I also examine if the management earnings forecasts characteristics vary across life cycle stages. For a sample of U.S. firms over the 2000-2021 period, I find that firms in the growth stage have a higher likelihood of issuing guidance, whereas the likelihood that firms in the introduction stage provide earnings forecasts is lower. Moreover, growth stage firms have a higher probability of initiating earnings guidance, while there is a higher likelihood that firms in the introduction, shake-out, and decline stage may stop providing guidance. I also find that earning forecast error is higher throughout the shake-out phase and firms at this stage estimate earnings with heightened optimism, suggesting that shake-out stage firms tend to be more biased as growth slows down. Firms in the introduction stage of their life cycle tend to project earnings with a positive outlook and forecast more good news regarding future earnings. However, growth stage firms tend to be more conservative by issuing more meetable or beatable management earnings forecasts. Finally, I find that the market is reacting uniformly to management earnings forecasts at different life cycle stages, consistent with firms facing potential cost-benefit tradeoffs in their disclosure decisions. Overall, the results suggest that managements’ decision to disclose earnings forecasts and the characteristics of earnings forecasts vary by life cycle stages.