Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Area of Study
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Discipline
Search Tips
AAS 2016 Print Program
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper will explore the history of Inner Asian and East Asian belts decorated with pendant ornaments and their gradual evolution from functional mobile toolkits to potent symbols of status and prestige donned by the highest echelons of society. By examining the earliest forms worn by steppe nomads and regional variations in the first millennium CE, it is possible to identify substantial shifts in their function, meaning, and reception.
Beginning in the Han dynasty, fabric belts worn to bind flowing robes began to be replaced by sturdier leather belts adopted from the horse-riders of the steppe. Two varieties gained popularity in China: the kua dai (belts with plaques placed at variable distances, with rings suspended from their lower edge so that knives, tallies, small bottles, etc. could be attached) and the diexie dai (belts on which strips of leather replaced the rings, allowing for additional accessories like leather pouches). Following the Han, both forms spread to the Xianbei in northeast China and to the early Korean and Japanese states, and they remained popular in China through the Tang and Liao periods. Although the later belts—often executed in precious materials like gold, silver, and semiprecious stones—continued to share features with the belts worn by Inner Asian nomads already in the seventh century BCE, they became more closely tied to the performance of kingship, religious authority, and ethic identity in specific localities.