Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Area of Study
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Discipline
Search Tips
AAS 2016 Print Program
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Organized Panel
The relationships between civil society, incivil discourse, and an uncivil society can be seen at different times in Indonesian society. The efforts of the reformation era to create a civil society gave rise to a freedom of press that allowed the emergence of incivil discourse against minority groups such as the Ahmadiyya and Shia. Greater freedom of the press and of speech has also meant more competing voice about Islamic authenticity. Authenticity discourses are marginalizing discourses; for one approach to be authentic, all others must be false. This panel examines a number of different cases that address different aspects of these issues. Early in Indonesia, authenticity discourses examined the relationship between communism and Islam. In the 1980s, young Indonesian men were drawn to mujahidin groups fighting as acts of piety, that is as a way to be find a more authentic Islam. More recently, MUI has established its own authenticity by undermining the authenticity of Ahmadiyya. It is not only more hardline approaches that contribute to uncivil society by claiming authenticity (and thereby denying it for others). The young men’s movement within Nahdlatul Ulama makes claims to authenticity that attempt to undermine the authenticity of hardline groups.
ISIS, Jihad and Indonesian Discourses on Islamic Authenticity - Greg Fealy, Australian National University
Why They Fight: The Social Experience of Becoming an Indonesian Mujahidin - Julie Chernov Hwang, Goucher College
Claiming "True Islam": The MUI and the Indonesian Ahmadiyya - Saskia Schaefer, Freie Universität Berlin
When Pluralism Became a Value for a Muslim Militia: The Case of Banser (Barisan Ansor Serba Guna) - Ronald Lukens-Bull, University of North Florida