Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Area of Study
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In recent years, marriage migrants in South Korea and Taiwan have been placed at the center of public debates regarding multiculturalism, demographic decline and social welfare. At the center of these debates is whether or not marriage migrants should be given equal access to citizenship. In both countries, grassroots advocacy groups have organized to secure more rights and equal recognition for migrant women. Marriage migrants and their children in Korea have been celebrated as the newest members of society, while marriage migrants in Taiwan have been regarded as a threat to the nation. What explains the divergence in attitudes toward marriage migrants? In this paper, I argue that the distinct ways by which women’s groups have negotiated women’s rights have shaped policies and public attitudes toward marriage migrant women. Activists in Korea were able to successfully bring attention to the human rights abuses against marriage migrants by relying on previous successes in advocating women's rights, whereas the women’s movement in Taiwan has been divided when it comes to advocating for migrant women as a women’s issue.