Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
When individuals attempt to learn about geopolitical issues like the implications of climate change, they will likely be confronted with multiple sources of conflicting information. This conflict could arouse intense emotional reactions, depending on how one perceives the nature of knowledge and knowing – one’s epistemic beliefs. In the present study, we examined how individuals created mental models across multiple text sources – some agree, others do not. We were particularly interested in how one’s epistemic beliefs predicted learning, and if this relationship was influenced by the emotions aroused while reading conflicting information. Results indicate that beliefs about the nature of knowledge and emotions uniquely and differentially predict learning when individuals read multiple conflicting documents on a controversial topic.
Robert William Danielson, University of Southern California
Gale M. Sinatra, University of Southern California
Krista R. Muis, McGill University
Reinhard Pekrun, University of Essex