Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The goal of the present study was to examine the role of explanations in understanding conflicting scientific information from multiple documents. A total of 57 undergraduates read 11 Internet documents on a controversial medical topic. We manipulated whether conflicting claims were accompanied by causal explanations or by topic-related filler information that did not provide any explanations for the occurrence of conflicts. Results revealed a marginally significant advantage for the explanation-group in terms of memory for conflicting information. Moreover, reading conflicts with explanations improved participants’ ability to apply their knowledge of conflicts in a social knowledge-building task. Results are discussed against the background of previous research on explanations in single text comprehension and are related to theories of multiple document comprehension.
Marc Stadtler, University of Münster
Lisa Scharrer, University of Münster
Rainer F. Bromme, University of Münster