Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

"How Does This Fit Together?" Effects of Explanations in Understanding Scientific Conflicts From Multiple Documents

Sat, April 18, 2:45 to 4:15pm, Sheraton, Floor: Second Level, Erie

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to examine the role of explanations in understanding conflicting scientific information from multiple documents. A total of 57 undergraduates read 11 Internet documents on a controversial medical topic. We manipulated whether conflicting claims were accompanied by causal explanations or by topic-related filler information that did not provide any explanations for the occurrence of conflicts. Results revealed a marginally significant advantage for the explanation-group in terms of memory for conflicting information. Moreover, reading conflicts with explanations improved participants’ ability to apply their knowledge of conflicts in a social knowledge-building task. Results are discussed against the background of previous research on explanations in single text comprehension and are related to theories of multiple document comprehension.

Authors