Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Advancing Causal Pluralism in Educational Evaluation

Sat, April 18, 2:45 to 4:15pm, Marriott, Floor: Third Level, Kane/McHenry

Abstract

Researchers and evaluators need to make causal claims when assessing the outcomes of educational policies and programs. Current debates on causality center on appropriate methodology and advance one dominant view of causality. In this paper, we promote causal pluralism, which contends that there are multiple ways of viewing and approaching causality. We discuss four different views on causality (i.e. narrative, generative, causal package, and complex systems) and illustrate how each view underlies a particular causal approach (i.e. Success Case Method, Realist Evaluation, Qualitative Comparative Analysis, and System Dynamics Modeling). By espousing causal pluralism, evaluators can work towards social justice by ensuring educational evaluations honor a diversity of ways of knowing related to the outcomes of policies and programs.

Authors