Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Researchers and evaluators need to make causal claims when assessing the outcomes of educational policies and programs. Current debates on causality center on appropriate methodology and advance one dominant view of causality. In this paper, we promote causal pluralism, which contends that there are multiple ways of viewing and approaching causality. We discuss four different views on causality (i.e. narrative, generative, causal package, and complex systems) and illustrate how each view underlies a particular causal approach (i.e. Success Case Method, Realist Evaluation, Qualitative Comparative Analysis, and System Dynamics Modeling). By espousing causal pluralism, evaluators can work towards social justice by ensuring educational evaluations honor a diversity of ways of knowing related to the outcomes of policies and programs.