Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Type: Symposium
The Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS) and the new Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) are two policy drivers in Race-to-the-Top. Are schools able to implement these innovations with fidelity? Do schools with poverty-challenged and diverse students achieve desired results? To address these questions, our research team adopted a comparative case study design using mixed methods (e.g., key informant interviews, focus groups, classroom observations, document reviews, surveys). We visited nine elementary schools. Six were deemed “odds-beaters” because they exceeded predicted performance on CCLS-aligned assessments in math and ELA. The four papers in this session present the research design and sampling method; findings about leadership and literacy instruction; and derived theories of action. A discussant from England provides an international-comparative critique.
Identification and Selection of "Odds-Beating" Elementary Schools: Comparisons of Relative School Performance on Common Core Assessments - Kathryn S. Schiller, University at Albany - SUNY; Michelle Feder
The Role of Proactive and Adaptive Leadership in the Adoption and Implementation of Two Major Policy Innovations - Francesca T. Durand, The Sage Colleges; Hal A. Lawson, University at Albany - SUNY; Michelle Feder
Refocusing Priorities for the Common Core: Literacy Instruction in Odds-Beating Diverse Elementary Schools - Kristen C. Wilcox, University at Albany - SUNY; Janet I. Angelis, State University of New York; Karen Gregory, University at Albany - SUNY
Deriving Theories of Action to Improve Policy, Practice, and Research - Hal A. Lawson, University at Albany - SUNY; Francesca T. Durand, The Sage Colleges; Sarah J Zuckerman, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Michael A. Lawson, University of Alabama