Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
What to do in Chicago
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this paper was to examine differences between undergraduate students who had multiple exposures to an assessment of moral reasoning development (DIT-2) and those of the same cohort who had fewer exposures to the same assessment. Controlling for a host of individual covariates, the analysis determined that students who took the DIT-2 three times scored statistically significantly higher than those who took this measure only twice. Effects were similar across two sets of analyses for two cohorts of students. These results suggest a relationship between taking the DIT-2 and long-term moral development gains. Implications are discussed.
Matthew Mayhew, New York University
Ernest T. Pascarella, University of Iowa
Teniell L. Trolian, University of Iowa
Benjamin Scott Selznick, New York University