Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Visiting Washington, D.C.
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Deans' performance assessments play developmental and decisional roles. They can potentially reinforce the university's expectations regarding the management of its units and support the fulfillment of their goals. This paper challenges these taken for granted assumptions and argues that deans' performance assessments are instead used as political tools of control. It presents a conceptual framework theorizing how the unique characteristics of universities and managers combine negatively and corrupt the outcomes of performance assessments, as well as the dean's role, by subjugating the university's goals to those of power coalitions. The conceptual framework opens and supports new research approaches to study the management of postsecondary institutions and provides policy-makers with realistic concepts to develop assessment policies.