Methodological Choices and Their Consequences in Education Research

• In Event: Roundtable Session 46

Session Type: Roundtable Session

Abstract

Research is not a self-evident path in the quest of unambiguous truth, but a set of practices involving a series of theoretical, methodological and analytical choices. Even when decisions are made after much deliberation, they are often presented as self-evident, because unambiguous findings are favoured in research. Using examples from large-scale assessment, classroom research and literacy assessments, this symposium illustrates how significantly methodological choices can impact research results. Research could be used to develop policies and promote practices, with far-reaching consequences. Given this, the four papers argue for reflexivity, methodological transparency and modesty in research claims.

Sub Unit

• Division D - Measurement and Research Methodologies / Division D - Section 3: Qualitative Research Methods

Chair

• Radhika Gorur, Deakin University

Papers

• Small Decision, Big Consequence: How Australia Moved to the "Good Quadrant" in PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) - Radhika Gorur, Deakin University

• Window, Lens, or Distorting Mirror: Choice and Consequence in Video-Based Research - David J. Clarke, University of Melbourne

• Young Learners: An Examination of Early Literacy Assessment Responses From Multiple Perspectives - Man Ching Esther Chan, The University of Melbourne

• Conclusions in the Making: Approaching Qualitative Understanding in Video-Based Classroom Research - Jennifer Lynne Martin, The Australian Catholic University