Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
“Friends-of-the-court” (amici curiae) have filed briefs that use educational research and other types of non-legal evidence to inform the Supreme Court’s deliberations in a series of cases that address equal educational opportunity. In Fisher v. University of Texas, the most recent of these cases, 92 amici briefs were filed the first time the case reached the Court in 2012. In this study, we ask: what arguments did amici use non-legal evidence to support and what are the patterns of arguments by supporting side and category of amici? Findings have implications for expanding the practical and theoretical understandings of research use in law, an arena that has important consequences for educational practice and for realizing the promise of equal educational opportunity.
Patricia Marin, Michigan State University
Liliana M. Garces, University of Texas at Austin
Catherine L. Horn, University of Houston