Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We are developing theory around aspects of mathematical knowledge for teaching in conjunction with assessment items we designed to measure those aspects. This effort is part of an ongoing validation process for investigating the construct of analyzing and responding to students’ mathematical work. We report on how we used Rasch modeling to investigate the difficulty of two types of assessment items, those that require teachers to 1) infer what a student understands based on that student’s work versus 2) respond to a student based on that student’s work. The data suggest that items requiring pedagogical responses from teachers are more difficult than items that require inferences about student understanding, suggesting a hierarchical relationship between these aspects of teacher knowledge.
Laurie O. Cavey, Boise State University
Michele Carney, Boise State University
Gwyneth Hughes, University of Wisconsin - Madison