Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
By extensive analyses of topics, methodology, and citations the research clarifies the nature of literacy research within and across countries, Taken together the findings provide a sketch of the empirical pathways for literacy research highlighting their differences and some areas of crossover. Despite Chinese extended contributions to the history of thought, empirical literacy research appears less developed and influential—superseded by somewhat dated western theoretical influences. In contrast, the US seems to have embraced socio-cultural considerations, but has done so in a fashion which is more insular than international. Arguably, there is a pattern for the US that is aligned with a kind of global standardization of epistemologies on western terms that represents an exclusion of eastern and southern epistemologies
Wei Kan, Beijing Normal University
Ran Xiang, The University of British Columbia
Robert J. Tierney, The University of British Columbia, The University of Sydney, Beijing Normal University