Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Proposing an integrative framework that links Bryk and colleagues’ five essential supports and Porter and colleagues’ policy attributes theory, we use a mixed-methods approach to study the implementation and effectiveness of school turnarounds in an urban school district. Using a matched comparison design and estimating a series of regressions to analyze data, we explore the relationships among key model components, approaches to implementation, and achievement. Qualitative methods are used to contextualize these findings and offer hypotheses to explain variation in outcomes. This study facilitates the development of an empirically grounded theory of how implementation relates to effectiveness that proves useful in assessing how policymakers and practitioners might leverage various aspects of implementation to create effective school improvement models at scale.
Kirsten Lee Hill, University of Pennsylvania
Laura M. Desimone, University of Pennsylvania
Tonya E. Wolford, School District of Philadelphia
Andrew C. Porter, University of Pennsylvania
Adrienne Reitano, School District of Philadelphia
David Kowalski, Temple University
Horatio W Blackman, University of Pennsylvania
Katherine Stratos, School District of Philadelphia