Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Given the significant increase of English Language Learners (ELLs) in public schools, this study explores how to develop assessment items that can more accurately elicit both ELLs’ and their non-ELL peers’ understanding of energy and matter in chemistry by comparing three item types: Explanation, Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER), and Modeling. The results show that the Explanation and CER items elicited significantly more correct ideas for non-ELLs, compared to ELLs. Yet the Modeling items were more effective in capturing a range of both normative and non-normative ideas for ELLs. The results of this study suggest the importance of considering the format of assessment items for linguistically diverse students.
Emily Toutkoushian, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Amanda Swearingen, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Kihyun "Kelly" Ryoo, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Kristin Bedell, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill