Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We assessed the effects of reading multiple refutation texts about genetically modified foods (GMFs) on participants’ misconceptions and attitudes. University students (N=217) drawn from two North American universities first read a refutation text on GMFs and were then randomly assigned to receive additional information about advantages of GMFs, disadvantages of GMFs, or both. Results revealed that students reading about the advantages of GMFs had significantly better attitudes than students that read about the disadvantages. Results also suggest that emotions significantly predicted changes in attitudes. There were also significant knowledge gains overall. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed including the impact these findings may have on science education.
Ian Thacker, University of Southern California
Krista R. Muis, McGill University
Robert William Danielson, University of Southern California
Gale M. Sinatra, University of Southern California
Reinhard Pekrun, University of Essex
Philip H. Winne, Simon Fraser University
Marianne Chevrier, McGill University