Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In March 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, a case addressing the constitutionality of “agency fees” for non-union teachers in California. Although the Court’s 4-4 decision in the wake of Justice Scalia’s death upheld the constitutionality of agency fees, several similar lawsuits have been filed since then, with the hope that a nine-member Supreme Court will issue a different decision. Using legal, historical, and empirical analyses, we examine Friedrichs as part of the broad-based effort to weaken public sector unions generally and teachers unions in particular, and we assess the likely effectiveness of cases like Friedrichs, both in the legal arena and as part of a strategy for improving teacher effectiveness.
Benjamin Michael Superfine, University of Illinois at Chicago
Regina R. Umpstead, Central Michigan University
David Mayrowetz, University of Illinois at Chicago
Sarah Winchell Lenhoff, Wayne State University
Ben Pogodzinski, Wayne State University